USPTO serial 78367681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shorts, shirts, tops, sweaters, track suits, warm-up suits, jump suits, socks, pants, jeans, head bands, arm/wrist bands, hats, caps, toques, underwear, panties, undershirts, bras, sport bras, suspenders, pajamas, nighties, night gowns, lingerie, panty hose, leotards, handkerchiefs, ties, dress shirts, vests, suits, blazers, bow ties, tuxedos, dress pants, wind breakers, jackets, coats, winter coats, trench coats, hoods, earmuffs, gloves, bathing suits, bikinis, shower caps, swimming caps, night caps, thongs, cloth bibs, bonnets, scarves, long johns, sports jerseys, overalls, visors, dresses, evening gowns, blouses, skirts, stocking caps, bandannas, sleep masks, uniforms; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, moccasins, sandals, slippers,and flip-flops | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |