Drawing for O2

USPTO serial 78367733

O2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with O2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard L. Blau

Howard L. Blau Law Offices of Howard L. Blau300 Park AvenueSuite 1700New York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic audio/video products - namely, televisions, dvd players, speakers, speaker systems consisting of a plurality of speakers, and audio components, namely, cd players, audio tuners and receivers, equalizers, amplifiers, pre-amplifiers, and satellite radio playersABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 11, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 11, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jul 15, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 8, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 9, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance