USPTO serial 78367955
CHARLOTTE JUMPER CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARLOTTE JUMPER CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Bryner
WILLIAM M BRYNER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1001 W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing namely, cardigans, sweaters, tank tops, clothing tops, turtleneck sweaters, v-neck sweaters, vests, aprons, head bands, sweat bands, wrist bands, neck bands, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, blazers, blouses, bow ties, boxer shorts, caps, leather coats, gloves, gym shorts, head wear, jackets, knit shirts, neckties, neckwear, night shirts, pajamas, sweat pants, pullovers, robes, golf shirts, polo shirts, sport shirts, sweat shirts, shorts, socks, jogging suits, play suits, sweat suits, warm-up suits, gym suits, sun visors, t-shirts, tennis wear, turtlenecks, visors, wind resistant jackets, wrist bands | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |