USPTO serial 78368679
CIVILEO, CIVILEOPHONIC, CIVLEOSCOPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIVILEO, CIVILEOPHONIC, CIVLEOSCOPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compact discs, DVD's, featuring [music, multimedia] Compact disc players [music, multimedia] Audio discs featuring [music] Audio speakers Audio cassette decks, Radio, CD/DVD Player for automobiles Computer network hubs, switches and routers Computer parallel ports Computer peripherals Computer serial ports Computer software [audio/visual | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |