Drawing for WHITLAM ENGINEERED IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78368893

WHITLAM ENGINEERED IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITLAM ENGINEERED IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Wiggins and Lisa M. DuRoss

Michael D. Wiggins and Lisa M. DuRoss Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.P.O. Box 828Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radio-frequency identification (RFID) labels for use in identifying and tracking merchandiseACTIVE
016paper labels, namely, blank or partially printed paper labels, printed paper labels, laminated paper labels, pressure-sensitive labels, heat transfer labels, reflective labels, in-mold labels, printed barcode labels for information retrieval and for identifying, tracking, recording and monitoring objects to which they are applied; barcode ribbons; thermal transfer ink ribbons; label printing machine ribbons; decals; iron-on transfers; bumper stickers; address plates; paper nameplates; paper stationery inserts; paper tags and hang tags for industrial, commercial stationery and household use; adhesive label dispensers and applicators for household or stationery useACTIVE
020plastic labels, namely, pressure-sensitive labels, decorative labels, blank or partially printed labels, printed labels, heat transfer labels, laminated labels, reflective labels, in-mold labels; plastic nameplates; plastic tags and hang tags for industrial, commercial, stationery and household useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance