USPTO serial 78368938
MYCRLSTUDY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3509873Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MYCRLSTUDY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
Wilmington, MA
Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
Wilmington, MA
Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
Wilmington, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree Street, NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an Internet web site at which customers may retrieve scientific research and laboratory test data from an on-line computer database | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MYCRLSTUDY.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |