USPTO serial 78369077
FUPSTORIES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUPSTORIES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
North Miami Beach, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | F-upstaories;com is about having a member interactive story club were the members would submit bizarre and interesting stories to the site; The stories will be divided it to regions; with each region having a catchy nickname, those regions are-- Hood tales, west coast riders, Midwest whispers, Southern hospitality, Beast of the east, Texas tale, Northern exposure, and Misalanious murmurs; The site will have animated characters related to each region, which they can click on to, enter that section; The stories will have animated characters depicting what's going on in the story; There will be music, which will correspond to each region; Some parts of the story may have vocal expressions; Members will submit their stories using a fictitious screen like-- tattle tale; so when their stories is shown it will also show the screen name to identify the story teller; then from all the stories submitted a selected amount will make it to the page | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |