USPTO serial 78369522
CONSUMERS' CHOICE AWARD FOR BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3663698Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONSUMERS' CHOICE AWARD FOR BUSINESS EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Business establishments; namely, any merchants of retail goods or providers of services offered to the general public and/or the business community | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Market Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Market Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Market Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named CONSUMERS' CHOICE AWARD FOR BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |