USPTO serial 78369681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lile H. Deinard, Esq.
EDWARD A FRIEDLAND THE THOMSON CORPORATION1 STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services in the field of employee training, assesment and human resources management, namely, providing assessment services to determine business skills and competencies; business consultation services in the nature of creating, defining and implementing strategies to strengthen and improve management, leadership, administration, sales, executive, corporate governance, customer service skills and competencies; Providing information to businesses, government agencies, academic institutions, associations and certification organizations about test scores and eligibility of employees and job candidates with respect to professional competency, vocational and professional certification, licensing and occupational and training skills; statistical information services in the fields of professional, vocational and educational testing and test question validity and providing human resource and management services via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2003 |
| 041 | Training in the field of human resources management for businesses, government agencies, academic institutions, associations and certification organizations, namely, assessment, training, certification testing of employees for vocational, professional and occupational skills; test-scoring and test score reporting services; conducting seminars, conferences, forums, electronic distance training, and workshops in human resources management, computer-based technology management, professional development, and employee career development; training of employees and assessment of employees' knowledge with respect to company products, services, policies and practices; providing training and educational development services, namely, creating self study and diagnostic materials and designing computer-assisted training programs in the fields of human resources management, computer-based technology management, professional development, employee career development, career guidance and job placement | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2003 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software over a global computer network for the purposes of employee and management training and education, general business knowledge and skills, educating employees and customers about new product features and usage, and human resource development | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |