USPTO serial 78369936
ECOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3267668Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN
D-10587 BERLIN, DE
D-91320 Ebermannstadt, DE
D-91320 Ebermannstadt, DE
D-91320 Ebermannstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic equipment, installations and systems for communications engineering and telecommunications, namely, devices for digital and analog telephone exchange and transmission installations, namely, gateways, routers, least-cost routers and switches for wireline and wireless networks, route-diversity systems comprised of computer hardware, routers and switches, backup-dial tone systems comprised of computer hardware, routers and switches, business continuity systems comprised of computer hardware, routers and switches, messaging systems comprised of computer hardware and software for storing voice and data messages digitally, wireless local-loop systems comprised of computer hardware and telecommunications software for transmitting wireless digital messages, mobile office systems comprised of computer hardware, data transceivers, routers and switches; messaging, alarm and notification systems comprised of data transceivers, wireless networks, and gateways for collection and management of data, alarm central units, switches and routers, computer hardware and telecommunications software for operating the messaging, alarm and notification systems; accessories for measuring and testing equipment, namely, electronic interface circuits, matching electrical connectors, test adapters, flexible electric cords for measuring and testing equipment; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks, and gateways for collection and management of data, switches and routers; change-over switches for telecommunication apparatus; telecommunication switches; devices, namely computer hardware and telecommunications software for transmitting wireless digital messages, signals, data, facsimiles, images and information, wireless facsimiles; wireless facsimile machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN
- Other trademarks owned by VIERLING Communications GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by VIERLING Communications GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by VIERLING Communications GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ECOTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |