USPTO serial 78369978
THEY SAY A DIAMOND IS FOREVER... THEN WHY WON'T THEY TAKE IT BACK? J. RAKE WILL. FOREVER.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALL, MICHAEL E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEY SAY A DIAMOND IS FOREVER... THEN WHY WON'T THEY TAKE IT BACK? J. RAKE WILL. FOREVER.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J. Rake, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by J. Rake, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named THEY SAY A DIAMOND IS FOREVER... THEN WHY WON'T THEY TAKE IT BACK? J. RAKE WILL. FOREVER.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |