USPTO serial 78369995
MARALIZE LEGIJUANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3125644Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARALIZE LEGIJUANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J DAY
MICHELLE ROSARIA BORDIEREPO BOX 1141OCALA, FL 34478-1141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts, hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Rosaria Bordiere
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Rosaria Bordiere
- Other trademarks owned by Michelle Rosaria Bordiere
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MARALIZE LEGIJUANA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 12, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |