Drawing for ABC APPLIED BEHAVIOR CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ CARING AND EFFECTIVE EDUCATION ~

USPTO serial 78370006

ABC APPLIED BEHAVIOR CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ CARING AND EFFECTIVE EDUCATION ~

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ABC APPLIED BEHAVIOR CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ CARING AND EFFECTIVE EDUCATION ~?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen E. Finnerty

KATHLEEN E FINNERTY FINNERTY LAW OFFICES, INC.Suite 2501430 Blue Oaks RoadRoseville, CA 95747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041education services in the nature of classes, workshops, seminars for the purpose of teaching individuals how to evaluate and treat children and adults with developmental disabilities and learning disorders, using early intensive intervention for children with autism or autism spectrum disorder based upon theoretical practices of "radical behaviorism," including functional assessment and analysis of behavior interfering with a child's ability to learn, to communicate, and to socialize with peers and adults, designed to reduce or eliminate problematic behavior while building and generalizing socially significant behaviorsACTIVEApr 14, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Aug 7, 2007CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2007CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 23, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 23, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 29, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 22, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance