USPTO serial 78370987
SPEC SHIFTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEC SHIFTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAK CREEK, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. RICK
MICHAEL B RICK WEBER & RICK SC5859 S 108TH STHALES CORNERS, WI 53130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Go-carts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |