USPTO serial 78371113
LUMI-CELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMI-CELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
Durham, NC
Other trademarks owned by Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
Durham, NC
Other trademarks owned by Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
XENOBIOTIC DETECTION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
DURHAM, NC
Other trademarks owned by XENOBIOTIC DETECTION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. Michael Sajovec
F. Michael Sajovec Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec4140 Parklake AvenueSuite 600Raleigh, NC 27612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Media for bacteriologic cultures and tissue cultures for in vitro use in biochemistry, biology and chemistry; diagnostic reagents for in vitro use in biochemistry, biology and chemistry; and kits primarily consisting of the foregoing products; and instructional materials sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Laboratory apparatus and instruments for chemical, biochemical and biological analyses, namely, microplate luminometers, microplate fluorescence readers, computers and software for data analyses, sample processing matrices and pipettes; kits for chemical, biochemical and biological analyses consisting primarily of the foregoing products; and instruction manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Xenobiotic Detection Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by XENOBIOTIC DETECTION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LUMI-CELL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |