Drawing for CUSTOMCHOICE

USPTO serial 78371570

CUSTOMCHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMCHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl S. Sawyer, Jr.

KARL S SAWYER JR KENNEDY COVINGTON LOBDELL & HICKMAN LLP214 N TRYON ST 47TH FLHEARST TWRCHARLOTTE, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment brokerage services, namely, fee-based nondiscretionary mutual fund services for customers with a minimum account size of $25,000ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 16, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 15, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 31, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 27, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 21, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 10, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 7, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 7, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 4, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 28, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance