CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SENSE

USPTO serial 78372202

SENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Kevin Gray; Linda M. Novak

J KEVIN GRAY LINDA M NOVAK FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Private Dining LoungeACTIVEAug 3, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 3, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 3, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 16, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 17, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance