USPTO serial 78372607
INCYTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INCYTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinlim-dong, Kwanak-ku, Seoul, KR
Shinlim-dong, Kwanak-ku, Seoul, KR
Kyonggi-do, KR
Kyonggi-do, KR
KYONGGI-DO, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE & DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotion relating to the sale of articles and services for third parties in the fields of physic-chemical apparatus and instruments, electronic apparatus and instruments for use in the fields of medical, biological, chemical, food industrial and veterinary and medical testing and/or diagnostic apparatus and instruments by the transmission of advertising material and the dissemination of advertising messages on computer networks; retail store services featuring medical apparatus and instruments and parts therefore, namely, cell analyzing apparatus, apparatus for counting number of cells, protein analyzing apparatus, microfluidics analyzing apparatus, blood condition analyzer, cell diagnostic apparatus, cell cultivating instruments, enzyme immonuassaying apparatus, apparatus for separating and extracting specific cells, instruments for injecting a specific gene to a cell, milk quality analyzers to calculate concentration of somatic cells of milk, analyzing apparatus for chemical components in food, lymph separating apparatus, apparatus for measuring coagulation condition, in-vitro diagnostic apparatus to supervise reaction against blood transfusion, DNA banding apparatus, blood extractors, blood separators and analyzing apparatus for using micro electric mechanical systems (MEMS) technologies, electronic apparatus and instruments for use in the fields of medical, biological, chemical, food, industrial and veterinary and parts therefore, namely, microscopes; encoded electronic chip containing thermoplastic information for cell biological research; and laboratory apparatus and instruments, namely, biochips, biochip scanners, percussion instruments, blood type tester, rapid kit or POC (point-of-care) devices for diagnostics, gene transfection and electroporation instruments, plastic chips and thermoplastic chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Bio Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Bio Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SKC Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SKC Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SKC LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INCYTO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |