USPTO serial 78372845
BRIGHTPOINT CREATIVE WIRELESS DISTRIBUTION · CUSTOMER COMMITMENT · CUSTOMIZED SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGHTPOINT CREATIVE WIRELESS DISTRIBUTION · CUSTOMER COMMITMENT · CUSTOMIZED SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOLIDAY W BANTA
HOLIDAY W BANTA WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of wireless communications equipment, namely, distributorships for wireless communications devices, including telephone handsets, pagers, and personal data assistants, wireless telephone battery chargers, battery eliminators, replacement batteries, wattage boosters, hands-free headsets and kits, holders and cradles, carrying cases and bags, ear phones, microphones, cigarette lighter adapters, antennae, hang-up cups, handset extension cables, power cables and data cables to order and specification, repair parts for wireless communications equipment, games for wireless communications equipment, downloadable and contained on CD-ROM, 2 point 45 gigahertz-compatible wireless communications devices, wireless computing devices, face plates for wireless communications devices, graphics for wireless communications devices, audio and video for wireless communications devices, digital cameras for wireless communications devices, data storage devices for wireless communications equipment to order and specification; inventory management for others of wireless communication equipment; accounts receivable management services in the field of wireless communication equipment | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2004 |
| 036 | Financial services relating to wireless communication equipment, namely, credit and debt recovery collection processing, and credit risk management services | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2004 |
| 037 | Repair and refurbishing of wireless communication equipment | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2004 |
| 039 | Inventory storage services, namely, storage of wireless communication equipment for others | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2004 |
| 042 | Packaging design for wireless communications equipment for others | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHTPOINT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Brightpoint, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHTPOINT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRIGHTPOINT CREATIVE WIRELESS DISTRIBUTION · CUSTOMER COMMITMENT · CUSTOMIZED SERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |