USPTO serial 78373033
SECURIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECURIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | We are a Workforce Solutions company that provides contract, consultant, and permanent resources on either a competitive or retained basis; We employ a comprehensive, metrics driven approach and work to deliver a minimum SLA of 1;8/1(Submittal/Hire) and 1;1/1(Interview/Hire) ratios; We achieve this by employing a 2-step best practice process-- 1- Before presentation candidates are screened for skills, cultural fit, and domain expertise using either generally accepted standards, or client supplied testing criteria; 2- After passing all screens, candidates are pre-interviewed by an internal SME and background checked; Critical Practices-- Continuity, Compliance, and Security 1- Business Continuity Planning /Management (BCP) Practice-- BCP identifies and mitigates the risks associated with critical Business-IT dependencies; Beyond disaster recovery and contingency planning, BCP models the human factors associated with maintaining 100% uptime of critical business systems, uncovers procedural points of failure, delivers a roadmap for risk mitigation, and provides oversight and implementation expertise as required; 2- Sarbanes-Oxley Practice-- Though Sarbanes-Oxley does not directly regulate technology; Enterprises can derive meaningful business value by clearly understanding the role of different technologies in their business processes, and applying key technologies and methods to reduce the cost of compliance; Our practice analyzes the IT processes, procedures, and technologies associated with the transparency and accountability of the Business, identifies and remediates compliance gaps, and recommends and deploys technology based compliance solutions; 3- Privacy and Security Practice-- Using best practices derived from HIPAA privacy standards, the Privacy and Security practice delivers fully compliant information security solutions to companies where privacy and security are a top priority; Based on our SecurIT product, the Privacy and Security practice cost effectively delivers hardened security with minimal user impact; Combining single sign-on, two-factor authentication, one-time password issuance and data encryption with full network integration, SecurIT is suitable for use on workstations, laptops, removable media and servers and is completely transparent to the end-user; SecurIT is simple to deploy and use and enables the enterprise to rapidly comply with the soundest of today's security policies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |