Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78373189?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78373189. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns RED RUBBER BALL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78373189, the listed owner(s) include: Carroll, Kevin, Carroll, Kevin.

What is USPTO serial number 78373189?

Serial number 78373189 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark RED RUBBER BALL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of RED RUBBER BALL?

RED RUBBER BALL (78373189) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover RED RUBBER BALL?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78373189

RED RUBBER BALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 24, 2004
Status date: Jan 4, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED RUBBER BALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Carroll, Kevin
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Carroll, Kevin
Carroll, Kevin
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Carroll, Kevin

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW R WILMOT

MATTHEW R WILMOT DUNN CARNEY ALLEN HIGGINS & TONGUE LLP851 SW 6TH AVE STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	educational services, namely, conducting motivational, organizational development seminars in the field of personal development	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 31, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 4, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 20, 2008	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Feb 28, 2008	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Feb 28, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 28, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 4, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 27, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 27, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 3, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jul 3, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2007	CNFR	SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 8, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 8, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 22, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2006	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Nov 6, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Oct 13, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2006	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Feb 17, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Jan 26, 2006	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Jan 26, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Jan 26, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2006	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 26, 2005	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Feb 9, 2005	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jan 28, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 23, 2005	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Dec 11, 2004	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 8, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 8, 2004	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 10, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—