Drawing for HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL

USPTO serial 78373945

HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HILL COUNTRY FARE SABOR TRADICIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirt S. O'Neill

KIRT S O'NEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meats; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved, dried, processed, and canned fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; compote; eggs; dairy products, namely, milk, cream, butter, yogurt, and cheese; edible oils and fats; fruit preservesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 24, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 21, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance