USPTO serial 78374466
STRAIGHT THROUGH WIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRAIGHT THROUGH WIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ethernet voltage link protectors, Ethernet bypass switch, voltage link protectors, transceivers, redundant transceivers, bypass switches network equipment computer network equipment, network switches,computer network switches, internet routers, network hub routers, redundant twisters, redundant network RJ45 category 5 and 6 Ethernet wiring, network wiring, telephone wiring, electrical wire, network appliances namely QOS, Security, and Web Filtering, gigabit network appliances namely QOS, Security,and Web Filtering, computer hardware and firmware, firmware for network management, firmware for use in interfacing, firmware for use in computer controls, computer peripherals, LAN (local area network),and wide area networks access points for connecting network computer users, storage area networks and networking components, namely wired and wireless network interface hardware and software, differential switches and connectivity switches, computer software in the nature of gateways, bridges, hubs, routers,modems, cabling, integrated circuits, power over Ethernet switches, communication system components namely switches, routers, hubs, and bridges, remote access equipment namely terminal servers, telephones,teleconferencing equipment, Intemet protocol telephony, PC card cables, hub and switch cables, WAN access cables, computer software for use as firewalls and filters, embedded firewall software and hardware, network interface cards, network jacks, power supplies namely those contained in switches,routers, network appliances, bridges, and hubs, wireless LAN antennas and cables, PC cards, Redundant power supplies namely those contained in switches, routers, network appliances, bridges, and hubs,interface cards and modules, wireless access points LAN (local area network) operating software, LAN(local area network) access points for connecting network computer users, computer systems, call processors, chassis, disk mirroring kits comprising [the applicant must specify the major components of theirs, multi-line telephones, attendant consoles, analog device connections, interface cards, integrated circuit power modules | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |