Drawing for PRIMURA

USPTO serial 78378652

PRIMURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Faber

ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of epilepsyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 30, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 23, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Jun 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 14, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 12, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance