USPTO serial 78382060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Humphreys
Lynn M. Humphreys Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely books in the fields of art, culture and design, postcards, stationery, crayon sets, and coloring books; and recipe cards and books in the fields of cooking, cuisine, and cookbooks related to Registrant's restaurant | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Glass beverage ware; dinnerware; coffee mugs; and shot glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, caps, hats, jackets, aprons, cloth bibs, scarves, and neckties | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely plush animals, toy figures, and cooking play sets | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products namely, salad dressings, sauces, marinades, vinegars, pastas, spices, chocolate; and gift baskets comprised primarily of sauces, chocolates, pasta, and spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Catering services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |