Drawing for THE MODERN

USPTO serial 78382060

THE MODERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MODERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

Lynn M. Humphreys Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely books in the fields of art, culture and design, postcards, stationery, crayon sets, and coloring books; and recipe cards and books in the fields of cooking, cuisine, and cookbooks related to Registrant's restaurantACTIVE
021Glass beverage ware; dinnerware; coffee mugs; and shot glassesACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, T-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, caps, hats, jackets, aprons, cloth bibs, scarves, and necktiesACTIVE
028Toys, namely plush animals, toy figures, and cooking play setsACTIVE
030Food products namely, salad dressings, sauces, marinades, vinegars, pastas, spices, chocolate; and gift baskets comprised primarily of sauces, chocolates, pasta, and spicesACTIVE
033WinesACTIVE
043Catering servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 7, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 3, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Feb 20, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 8, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 6, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Mar 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance