USPTO serial 78384048
TRUMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Costas
Peter L. Costas Trumpf Inc.Hyde RoadFarmington, CT 06032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Devices for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams, namely laser ablation systems, laser annealing systems, laser color change systems, laser engraving systems, laser foaming systems, and laser marking systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Software for devices for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams, namely user interface for using the marking laser in manual mode, tools for generating and optimizing a marking program, control program for the marking laser, functions to display the operating status and messages, user administration, electronic manual, creation of new graphics, modification of existing drawings; import function and data converter for vector and pixel based graphic formats, allocation of laser parameters to drawing elements, integration of production data, data exchange with external systems; connection to external databases, generation of flow programs, creating fonts for the laser marking, importing fonts in order to convert them for the laser marking, changing existing fonts, switching the laser on and off, loading and starting the marking program, control of laser and laser machine functions, control and monitoring of all processes in the marking laser, generation and saving of reports, display of saved reports and text on the monitoring and error reports, and display of laser unit status information and operating data for devices for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams, control devices for lasers and laser devices, namely electrical control devices for lasers and laser devices; scanners; telescopes, coolers for lasers; lasers, not for medical purposes; optical lenses; optical mirrors; items of radiation protective clothing; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, converting, storing, controlling, and monitoring electricity, in connection with lasers, laser systems and controllers for laser systems, namely power supply units, switch mode power supplies, high-frequency change-over switches, matching networks, electrical converters and inverters, frequency converters; data processing equipment, namely computers, mouses, keyboards, USB connections, monitors; profibusses, CAN busses, modems, CD burner, blank floppy disks, Ethernet cards, scanner cards, and network cards for devices for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams and computers, except data communications cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Material processing, in particular material processing by means of laser beams, namely ablation, annealing, color change, engraving, foaming and marking by means of laser beams | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing and compiling software devices for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams, namely setting-up, installation, maintenance, copying, converting, up-dating, servicing of computer programs and computer software, including such services provided via the Internet; remote programming of machine controls, running-in of software updates in machine controls; planning and provision of Internet applications on machine control systems, namely via telephone line or access via TCP/IP for remote operations of the laser or laser machine, display of operational values, search for troubles, read-out of operational data and transfer of those, change of parameters and update of the software for labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams; scientific and technological services, namely scientific and technological services in conjunction with devices for and processes of labeling, marking, decorating, and processing surfaces by means of laser beams, in particular IT consulting, including hardware and software consulting; technical consulting including technical project planning and technical project management, and research work, namely research work in conjunction with devices for and processes of labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams and related designer services, namely design and planning of telecommunication solutions for the remote diagnosis of machine malfunctions and for machine servicing by means of telecommunications technology; design and planning of Internet access on machine control systems, industrial analysis and research services, including those in conjunction with the application of lasers, laser devices and laser systems, namely industrial analysis and research in conjunction with devices for and processes of labeling, marking, decorating and processing surfaces by means of laser beams; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trumpf GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Trumpf GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRUMARK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |