Drawing for FOOD SENTRY

USPTO serial 78386909

FOOD SENTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD SENTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Travis L. Bachman

TRAVIS L BACHMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Periodicals, Magazines, And Newsletters In The Field Of Food SafetyABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 26, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance