USPTO serial 78391755
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denis A. Polyn
JON O WEBSTER Bausch & Lomb Incorporated1400 N. Goodman StreetRochester, NY 14609UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OPHTHALMIC LENS CLEANING PRODUCTS, NAMELY LENS CLEANING SOLUTIONS AND PRE-MOISTENED, NON-MEDICATED CLEANING TISSUES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
| 005 | OPHTHALMIC PHARMACEUTICALS, NAMELY CONTACT WETTING AND CLEANING LENS SOLUTIONS AND TABLETS, EYE DROPS, SOLUTIONS, GELS, LUBRICANTS AND OINTMENTS USED FOR MOISTURIZING THE EYE AND TO TREAT EYE INFECTION, EYE INFLAMMATION AND OTHER ALLERGY SYMPTOMS; OPHTHALMIC VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC TEST STRIPS; VISCOELASTIC PREPARATIONS USED IN OPHTHALMIC SURGERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
| 009 | CONTACT LENSES, PLASTIC BLANKS FOR CONTACT LENSES, CONTACT LENS CASES, EYEGLASS REPAIR KITS COMPRISED OF SCREWDRIVER, HINGE SCREWS AND HINGE RINGS; REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR EYEGLASSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, DIAGNOSING EYE CONDITIONS AND FITTING OF LENSES; MAGNIFIERS, BINOCULARS, SPOTTING SCOPES AND TELESCOPES; OPTICAL LENS CLEANING PRODUCTS, NAMELY EYEGLASS CLEANING CLOTHS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
| 010 | OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND DEVICES USED IN DIAGNOSING EYE CONDITIONS AND PERFORMING OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY LASERS, ABERROMETERS, TOPOGRAPHERS, KERATOMES AND BLADES, PHACOEMULSIFICATION DEVICES, HAND HELD OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS NAMELY FORCEPS, SCISSORS, KNIVES, BLADES, HANDLES, DISSECTORS AND NEEDLES, INTRAOCULAR LENSES, INTRAOCULAR LENS INSERTERS, INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTS, ENDOSCOPES, TONOMETERS AND CORNEAL SHIELDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS, NEWSLETTERS, PRODUCT INSERTS, PATIENT FITTING GUIDES AND PRODUCT CARE GUIDES IN THE FIELD OF EYE CARE AND HEALTH OF THE EYE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
| 041 | PROVIDING INFORMATION AND TRAINING FOR THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATING CONSUMERS IN THE FIELD OF EYE CARE AND HEALTH OF THE EYE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 20, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |