Drawing for TRAILER PRO

USPTO serial 78394352

TRAILER PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAILER PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory V. Novak

GREGORY V NOVAK NOVAK DRUCE & QUIGG LLP400 E TWR1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle towing apparatus, namely, trailers and carriages for the transportation of towing vehicles; snowmobile and recreational vehicle trailers, cargo trailers, motorcycle trailers, car hauling trailers, and ATV trailers, trailer hitches, cargo overhead carriers for vehicles and trailers, and trailer towing accessories, namely, aero-dynamic fairings for vehicles and trailers, adjustment chains, hitches and tow bars for vehicles and trailers, and structural parts thereforACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 4, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 4, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 12, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 27, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 27, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 27, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance