USPTO serial 78397517
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruth Przygoda
RUTH PRZYGODA THE QUIZNO'S MASTER LLC1475 LAWRENCE STE 400DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE SALE OF RESTAURANT SERVICES, THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF A GIFT CARD PROGRAM; GIFT CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, ISSUING GIFT CARD CERTIFICATES WHICH MAY BE REDEEMED FOR PREPARED FOOD AND RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |