USPTO serial 78401771
INNOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Langley, Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBATES ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated preparations for hair and scalp care; shampoos; hair colouring preparations; hair lotions; hair waving preparations; hair conditioners; hair styling products; hair gels; hair spray; hair mousse | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |