Drawing for THOUGHT COLLECTIVE

USPTO serial 78402664

THOUGHT COLLECTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THOUGHT COLLECTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Feldman

JONATHAN FELDMAN MAGASINN & FELDMAN4640 ADMIRALTY WAY STE 402MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by distributing advertising materials through a variety of methodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 21, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 25, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 25, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 24, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 24, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 24, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 27, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 10, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 9, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance