USPTO serial 78409927
AGE-LESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3633095Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AGE-LESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces, eggs, milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt milk products; edible oils and fats; all having a reduced content of unhealthy substances arising during processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |