USPTO serial 78410182
ESSENSUALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSENSUALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Surrey, GB
MIDDLEGREEN, SLOUGH, GB
MIDDLEGREEN, SLOUGH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Ajhar
Marsha G. Ajhar HARTMAN & CRAVEN LLP488 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Provision of training and instruction in hairdressing; educational services relating to hair and hairdressing, namely, providing classes in the field of hairdressing, and arranging and conducting of symposiums and seminars relating to hair and hairdressing; educational demonstrations of hairdressing; production of shows, films and videos relating to hair and hairdressing | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hairdressing services; hairdressing salon services; beauty salon services; information services relating to hair and hairdressing; professional consultancy services relating to hair and hairdressing; rental of apparatus and instruments for beauty salons and hairdressers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Essensuals Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENSUALS GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENSUALS GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ESSENSUALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |