USPTO serial 78411452
XCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wanchai, Hong Kong, CN
Wanchai, Hong Kong, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Haarz
DAVID R HAARZ HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC11730 PLAZA AMERICA DR STE 600RESTON, VA 20195UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated tools and power tool accessories, namely, glue guns, lawn mowers, woodworking machines, namely, sanding machines, planers, saws, routers, cutting machines, lathes, drill presses, polishers, grinders, hedge trimmers, shears, tacking and nailing machines, wrenches, hammers, drills, drill bits sharpeners, screwdrivers, sanders, blowers, autogenous soldering machines, grinding machines for metal working and machine tools for cutting and forming of materials, all for use in agriculture, horticulture, building, decorating, plumbing, electrical supply, woodworking, metalworking, pottery or vehicle maintenance, vacuum cleaners, electric kitchen machines, namely, mixers, electric food blenders, electric food grinders for commercial, industrial or domestic uses, electric food slicers, electric food choppers, electric egg beaters, electric can openers, electric fruit peelers, electric juice extractors, electric juicers, electric knife sharpeners, electric pasta makers for domestic use, electric vegetable peelers, electric food processors and dish washing machines, spray guns for paints, jacks, pumps, air compressors, multi-purpose high pressure washers, road sweepers, garden shredders, waste disposal apparatus, namely, garbage disposals | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand tools and implements (hand-operated), namely abrading instruments, agricultural implements, namely, trowels, weeding forks, spades, hoes, garden tools, namely, lawn clippers, pruning knives, pruning scissors, garden scissors, cultivators, hand tools (hand-operated), namely, sanders, tool belts, tool holders, can openers, pliers, clamps, chisels, scissors, rakes, picks, lawn edgers, drill bits for hand drills, sharpening wheels, food grinders, grinding wheels, saws and saw blades, planers, routers, hand drills, screwdrivers, cutters, namely, wire cutters, bolt cutters, tube cutters, cable cutters, hammers, jacks, punches, shears, edge trimmers, forks and knives, pruning shears | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |