USPTO serial 78415554
MADE IN BROOKLYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADE IN BROOKLYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK CITY, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MURRAY M. LOECHER
MURRAY M LOECHER MURRAY M LOECHER130 PRINCE STNEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASS CASE, EYEGLASS FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S JEWELRY MADE OF SEMI-PRECIOUS AND PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED NAMELY CUFFLINKS, ANKLE AND WRIST BRACELETS, CHAINS, BELT BUCKLES, EARRINGS, BROOCHES, EAR STUDS, EAR CLIPS, MONEY CLIPS, NECKLACES, COSTUME JEWELRY, PENDANTS, MEDALLIONS, RINGS, WATCHES, POCKET WATCHES, WATCH BANDS, WATCH FOBS, WRIST WATCHES, STOP WATCHES, WATCH STRAPS, ALARM CLOCKS, TABLE CLOCKS, CLOCKS INCORPORATING RADIOS, JEWELRY BOXES, JEWELRY CASES, CIGARETTE BOXES, CIGARETTE HOLDERS, CIGARETTE LIGHTERS, DECORATIVE BOXES, ASHTRAYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING NAMELY COATS, RAINCOATS, SUITS, DRESSES, BLAZERS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, JACKETS SPORT COATS, SUITS, TUXEDOS, VESTS, SKIRTS, PANTS, SLACKS, SHIRTS, JEANS, TROUSERS, JUMPSUITS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, UNDERWEAR, SHORTS, SOCKS, LEG WARMERS, PANTYHOSE, TIGHTS, T-SHIRTS, HALTER TOPS, TANK TOPS, LINGERIE, LOUNGEWEAR, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHTSHIRTS, SLIPS, BRASSIERES, BUSTIERS, GARTER BELTS, NEGLIGEES, ROBES, PAJAMAS, LEGGINGS, HEADWEAR, HATS, CAPS, HEADBANDS, NECKTIES, BOWTIES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, GLOVES, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, SHOES, FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BEACHWEAR, BRIEFS, BOXER SHORTS, UNDERPANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |