USPTO serial 78415636
UNICHLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with UNICHLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
St. Louis, MI
Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
St. Louis, MI
Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
St. Louis, MI
Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan J. Schomer
Bryan J. Schomer DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC2600 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 300Troy, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing economic information in the field of construction and operation of chlor-alkali plants and processes for the manufacture of chlorine, caustic, and hydrogen and subsequently sodium hypochlorite, ferric chloride, calcium hypochlorite, hydrochloric acid, and other chlorine derivatives; providing product information in the field of equipment for chlor-alkali plants | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powell Fabrication & Manufacturing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named UNICHLOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |