USPTO serial 78422149
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen S. Simpson, Esq.
ANNE F DOWNEY ESQ DOWNEY & DOWNEY8999 ROCKWOOD RDBOSTON, NY 14025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy and non-dairy whipped toppings and fillings, being frozen or non-frozen, and being ready-to-use or not ready-to-use; edible oil-based oleaginous emulsion sold in unpressurized and pressurized containers capable of being whipped or aerated for use as a topping on desserts, bakery products, pastry and confectionery; dairy-based non-alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery goods, being frozen or non-frozen, and being par-baked or fully baked or in the form of doughs, namely breads, buns, rolls, pizza crusts, focaccia bread, cookies, and muffins; desserts, being frozen or non-frozen, namely cakes, pies and cheesecakes; muffin mixes; cake mixes; non-dairy based non-alcoholic beverages and bases for making milk shakes; icing | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups and non-alcoholic cocktail beverage concentrates and syrups for making non-carbonated smoothies and smoothie-type beverages, namely, slush drinks, fruit smoothies, vegetable smoothies, and other frozen blended smoothie beverages; soy-based preparations for making frozen drinks not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |