Drawing for RICHLIFE

USPTO serial 78422149

RICHLIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHLIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen S. Simpson, Esq.

ANNE F DOWNEY ESQ DOWNEY & DOWNEY8999 ROCKWOOD RDBOSTON, NY 14025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy and non-dairy whipped toppings and fillings, being frozen or non-frozen, and being ready-to-use or not ready-to-use; edible oil-based oleaginous emulsion sold in unpressurized and pressurized containers capable of being whipped or aerated for use as a topping on desserts, bakery products, pastry and confectionery; dairy-based non-alcoholic beveragesACTIVE
030Bakery goods, being frozen or non-frozen, and being par-baked or fully baked or in the form of doughs, namely breads, buns, rolls, pizza crusts, focaccia bread, cookies, and muffins; desserts, being frozen or non-frozen, namely cakes, pies and cheesecakes; muffin mixes; cake mixes; non-dairy based non-alcoholic beverages and bases for making milk shakes; icingACTIVE
032Non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups and non-alcoholic cocktail beverage concentrates and syrups for making non-carbonated smoothies and smoothie-type beverages, namely, slush drinks, fruit smoothies, vegetable smoothies, and other frozen blended smoothie beverages; soy-based preparations for making frozen drinks not being milk substitutesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 13, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Nov 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jun 2, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 2, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 9, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 9, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 6, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION
Feb 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance