Drawing for RICHLIFE

USPTO serial 78422189

RICHLIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHLIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen S. Simpson, Esq.

ANNE F DOWNEY ESQ DOWNEY & DOWNEY8999 ROCKWOOD RDBOSTON, NY 14025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy and non-dairy whipped toppings and fillings, being frozen or non-frozen, and being ready-to-use or not ready-to-use; edible oil-based oleaginous emulsion sold in unpressurized and pressurized containers capable of being whipped or aerated for use as a topping on desserts, bakery products, pastry and confectionery; dairy-based non-alcoholic beveragesACTIVE
030Bakery goods, being frozen or non-frozen, and being par-baked or fully baked or in the form of doughs, namely breads, buns, rolls, pizza crusts, focaccia bread, cookies, and muffins; desserts, being frozen or non-frozen, namely cakes, pies and cheesecakes; muffin mixes; cake mixes; non-dairy based non-alcoholic beverages and bases for making milk shakes; icingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 12, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 20, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 9, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 9, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Jan 7, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance