Drawing for ONE HOME

USPTO serial 78423182

ONE HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rose Auslander

ROSE AUSLANDER CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP2 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, maintaining mortgage escrow accounts, mortgage banking, mortgage brokerage, mortgage lending, mortgage procurement for others, buyer pre-qualification of mortgages for mortgage brokers and banks, financial services in the nature of an investment security, financial analysis and consultation, financial evaluation for insurance purposes, financial forecasting, financial information processing, financial investment in the field of community development, financial management, financial planning, financial portfolio management, financial research, financial risk management, money lending, investment fund transfer and transaction services, savings programs for youths, a total portfolio offering for high net worth clients consisting of both separate accounts and mutual funds for equity and fixed income investments, and assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance