USPTO serial 78427643
KNOCKOUTS RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2006
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KNOCKOUTS RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CARLSBAD, CA
Islip Terrace, NY
Islip Terrace, NY
ISLIP TERRACE, NY
Islip Terrace, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel, Kenneth R. Costello, Andrew Klungness, Maurice B. Stiefel, Lawrence G. Kurland, Stephen P. Gilbert, Stephen M. Haracz, Warren K. MacRae, Erik Wolff Kahn, Todd J. Braverman, Howard Moss Rogatnick, David A. Roodman, Lucinda A. Althaus
GIORDANELLA, JOSEPH A.21 SEAL ROADISLIP TERRACE, NY 11752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services, namely, providing food and beverages to the public | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KO PIZZERIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Giordanella, Joseph A.
- Other trademarks owned by Giordanella, Joseph A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIORDANELLA, JOSEPH A.
- Other trademarks owned by Joseph A. Giordanella
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named KNOCKOUTS RESTAURANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 23, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |