Drawing for ANTLER ADVANTAGE

USPTO serial 78432882

ANTLER ADVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANTLER ADVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amber Stevens or Peter Janzen

AMBER STEVENS OR PETER JANZEN LAND O' LAKES INC4001 LEXINGTON AVE NMS 2500ARDEN HILLS, MN 55011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Forage Seed for agricultural purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jan 17, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 17, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 10, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance