USPTO serial 78432925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Fe Springs, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-itch cream, Anti-wrinkle cream, Body cream, Cold cream, Hair removing cream, Hand cream, Lip cream, Nail cream, Night cream, Shaving cream, Skin cleansing cream, Skin cream, Vanishing cream, After-shave gel, Age retardant gel, Bath gel, Hair gel, Sculpting gel, Shaving gel, Shower gel, Sun tan gel, Tooth gel, Age retardant lotion, Baby lotion, Bath lotion, Body mask lotion, Hair waving lotion, Shaving lotion, Skin cleansing lotion, Skin lotion, Sun tan lotion,Anti-bacterial soap, Deodorant soap, Medicated soap, Saddle soap, Shaving soap, Skin soap, Toilet soap, Waterless soap, Bath foam, Shaving foam, Foot deodorant spray, Hair spray, Scented body spray | ACTIVE | Jun 10, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |