Drawing for CUSTOMPLAY

USPTO serial 78433215

CUSTOMPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph M. Vanek

JOSEPH M VANEK DAAR & VANEK PC225 W WASHINGTON ST FL 18CHICAGO, IL 60606-2418UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in devices capable of playing optical disks, for enabling control and search of digitized video content; software for use in devices having a hard disk drive, for enabling control and search of digitized video content; digitized video content segment information to enable devices capable of playing optical disks to control and search digitized video content; digitized video content segment information to enable devices having a hard disk drive to control and search digitized video contentACTIVESep 30, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 11, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 8, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance