USPTO serial 78440053
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LANCASHIRE, GB
Crewe, Cheshire, GB
Crewe, Cheshire, GB
Crewe, Cheshire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristine M. Miller
Ester Martin Maillaro Holland & Hart LLP555 17th Street, Suite 3200P.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective clothing and footwear, namely, reflective and fluorescent clothing, namely, vests, waistcoats, tabards, bibs, armbands, jackets, fleece outerwear, trousers and rainwear; reflective and fluorescent footwear; reflective and fluorescent headgear, namely, hats, helmets and baseball caps; all being for the protection of accident or injury | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, vests, waistcoats, tabards, bibs, armbands, jackets, fleece outerwear, trousers and rainwear; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and baseball caps | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |