Drawing for EARTH TO TABLE

USPTO serial 78443247

EARTH TO TABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTH TO TABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jimmy K. Sun

JIMMY K SUN SUN & PARTNERS3650 VICTORIA PARK AVE STE 301TORONTO, ON M2H 3P7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Vases, serving platters, serving spoons, serving forks, serving tongs, serving ladles, serving trays not of precious metal, serving bowls, serving dishes, bowls, plates, teapots not of precious metals, cups, saucers, mugs, drinking glasses, pouring spouts for household use, drinking vessels, table placecard holders not of precious metal, candle holders not of precious metals, candle rings not of precious metals, napkin holders, napkin rings not of precious metals, canister sets, coolers for wine, salt and pepper shakers, oil and vinegar dispensers not of precious metals, cheese shakers, garlic presses, spoon rests, meal trays, recipe boxes, ornaments made of china, crystal, ceramic, glass, porcelain and terracotta not including Christmas tree ornaments, ceramic figurines, glass figurines, commemorative plates, decorative plates, statuettes made of ceramic, porcelain and glass, sculptures made of ceramic, porcelain and glass, sun catchers and holders for flowers and plantsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 1, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 12, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance