USPTO serial 78452250
SAFECREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFECREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Smith
NEIL A SMITH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR 17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Document preparation, namely, collection, transcription, compilation and systemization of written communications and data in the field of preventing and assisting with repairing and preventing damage caused by loss or compromise of identification information, credit information and damage to credit status; monitoring consumer credit reports and providing an alert as to any changes therein; credit/debit card registration for providing notification and cancellation for lost or stolen cards; providing insurance agent referrals for incidents involving consumer fraud, credit fraud and identity theft; referrals in the field of alternate dispute resolution services; marketing consultation in the field of identity theft | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Document preparation, namely, insurance claim administration and processing for identity theft; credit consultation for individuals harmed by identity theft or lost or stolen credit cards, drivers' licenses, passports, airline tickets and other personal identity data or documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing training courses in the field of Internet and e-mail security and fraud prevention | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft for preventing and assisting with repairing damage caused by loss or compromise of identification information, credit information and damage to credit status; and consulting in the field of fraud protection against Internet and e-mail security breaches, data theft and identity theft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Credit.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Credit.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SAFECREDIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |