USPTO serial 78455606
AROMA BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AROMA BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
Charleston, SC, US
Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
John Island, SC, US
Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
Charleston, SC, US
Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marjorie Witter Norman
Marjorie Witter Norman Reed Smith LLPP.O. BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products and moisturizing agents, namely, herbal facial creams, herbal skin creams, [ liposome creams, ] eye creams, vanishing creams, skin emollient creams, face [ and body ] creams, face [ and body ] gels, [ hand and ] body lotions, beauty masks, face [ and body ] scrubs, face [ and body ] exfoliants, [ fruit acid facial wash, fruit acid body cream, fruit acid facial mask, ] skin cleansers, skin toners, skin gels, facial lotions, [ and skin oils, bath oils, massage oils, massage cream, herbal skin oils, tanning oils, essential oils for personal use, body moisture gels, herbal body spritzers, seaweed based face and body creams, body washes, shower gels, bath salts, bubble baths, ] skin cleansing lotions and creams, aloe toners [, shaving creams, aftershave lotion, aftershave cream, aftershave gels, toilet soap, skin soap, deodorant soap, suntan and sunscreen lotions, suntan gels, suntan creams, hair shampoos, hair gels, hair rinses, hair spray, hair styling preparations and personal deodorants ] | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 1999 |
| 005 | [ Acne creams; ] acne gel; topical skin vitamin supplements | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Labs Natural Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named AROMA BELLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 5, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |