USPTO serial 78456847
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen A. Thompson
STEPHEN A THOMPSON COPELAND THOMPSON FARRIS PC231 S BEMISTON AVE STE 1220SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-1914UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Packaging/packing machines and equipment, namely, shrink systems, stretch systems, skin pack systems, blister sealing, carton sealing, bag sealers, bagging machines, tape machines, stencil machines, roller coders, printing equipment and supplies | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1994 |
| 016 | Packaging materials to protect a product from itself or the environment, namely, stretch film, shrink film, tape, chipboard/corrugated cartons, void fill, dunnage, foam, paper bags, plastic bags, paper, bubble rolls and sheets; materials used to close, seal or secure a product or container, namely, adhesives, films, staples, strapping and tape; materials to identify a product or give special instructions for handling, namely, labels, tags, bags, boxes, film, tapes and marking supplies | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |