USPTO serial 78458674
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Beverly Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR PC1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3527UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement protein bars, nutritionally fortified beverages, dietary supplements and diet aids, namely, vitamins and mineral supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, tank tops, t-shirts, shorts, polo shirts, leotards, caps and visors, sweat bands, sweat pants, sweat suits, sweatshirts, track pants and track suits, warm up suits, jogging pants, jogging suits, gym shorts, gym suits, socks, swimsuits, tights, and wind resistant jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services and on-line educational services, namely providing instruction in the fields of exercise equipment, physical exercise and nutrition, and instructional materials distributed in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |